Passive-Aggressive Executive Power

Written By Maryland Law Review

Corinna Barrett Lain

My contribution to the 2013 Constitutional Law Schmooze poses a question about the downside of executive power, at least in the enforcement context. If executive power to enforce the law presupposes the duty to use it, what happens when the executive branch would rather not?

Perhaps reframing the question will help. What do the death penalty, driving violations, drugs, deportation, and the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) have in common, besides the letter “d”? The answer is passive-aggressive executive power, and in the brief discussion that follows, I use these five factual contexts to illustrate five variations of what I mean.

Maryland Law Review
Previous

How Equal Protection Did and Did Not Come to the United States, and the Executive Branch Role Therein
Next

The Court’s Decisive Hand Shapes the Executive’s Foreign Affairs Policymaking Power